
Current Issues
Jump to: Introduction | Advocacy
Issues | CFBS & Partners' Activities |
International Dimension | Partnerships in Scientific
Meetings| Public Awareness | Future
Scientific Themes | Financial Issues
CFBS Fourth Annual Strategic Planning Meeting
Saturday, November 16th, 2002
10:00 AM - 1:00 PM
Quebec Room, Lord Elgin Hotel
Executives or representatives of the life sciences research community,
granting councils, CIHR Institute Directors, CFBS societies have in the
past been involved in the Strategic Planning Meeting and have again been
invited to attend the 4th Strategic Planning Meeting.
AGENDA
1. Review of past year
a) Advocacy
b) CFBS involvement with other advocacy partners (strength in numbers)
- Partnership Group for Science & Engineering (PAGSE)
- Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) (Paul Ledwell, Chair)
c) Our newest partnership involvement--Health Research Advocacy Network
(HRAN) (John Hylton, Chair)
d) Other
e) New CFBS member societies
2. The International Union of Biological Societies (IUBS) - Should Canada
be a member?
a) Hamid Jorjani (Senior Advisor, International Relations) (NRC)
3. Scientific Meetings
a) Role of the CFBS Annual Meeting
b) Role of CIHR Institutes
c) Public Awareness Issues and the Annual Meeting
d) Future Scientific Themes/ Locations??
e) Internet Café
f) Service that CFBS can provide to Societies.
- Organize Society annual meetings
- Website organization
- Other services?? (Questions and Answers)
g) What form(s) of Scientific Meeting is most attractive to the life sciences
community?
h) Suggestions for change
4. Financial Issues
a) Reducing overhead costs
- Sharing space/office equipment and personnel with other life sciences
groups. (Current status)
b) Website Income
- Job postings
- Advertising
c) CFBS Annual Meeting Income
- Registrations
- Exhibits
- Sponsorships
- Employment Fair
5. Other Items?
INTRODUCTION
This
meeting focused on partnerships in both our "advocacy" activities
and in the organization and promotion of the Life Sciences through Scientific
Conferences.
This year's session saw the participation of 22 individuals with representation
from CFBS societies, other life sciences societies and granting councils.
The chair of the Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) and an advocacy
group was also present. CFBS serves as CCR's steering committee. Also
present was Dr. Hamid Jorjani (National Research Council).
With regards to the advocacy issues, our belief, which is shared by other
similar groups, is that there is strength in numbers. If you wish to present
an issue to a decision-maker and this decision-maker realizes that you
represent a large population of members a great deal more credence will
be given to that issue than if you represent a smaller group.
Advocacy Issues
The issues that we highlighted during the past year have included the
following:
- Reminding the Federal government of their goal of moving Canada from
14th place to amongst the top 5 nations in their investment in R &
D. This action alone should result in increased funding for Granting
Councils.
- Encouraging Federal /Provincial Governments to develop a joint vision
regarding post-secondary education. We believe that this is essential
to ensure the production of highly qualified personnel (HQP) to satisfy
the needs of the academic, governmental and industrial communities.
- Canada's need for HQP.
- Increase significantly training stipends for graduate students and
postdoctoral fellows. Given the need for HQP and the increased debt
load being born by undergraduates, many are opting-out of advanced degrees
since the low stipends and another 5-7 years of debt are becoming a
deterrent.
- Advising the federal government that the support of "indirect
costs" of research be a high priority.
- Encourage the federal government to develop an allocation formula
for the granting councils that would result in more uniform budgets
from one year to the next. We have suggested a type of 3-year rolling
average. This would permit greater opportunity for granting councils
to plan ahead. And would insure investigators of a level playing field
no matter the year in which they apply for a research grant.
- Reminding Government of their commitment to increase the funding to
CIHR over 5 years to $1 billion. This commitment was made since CIHR's
mandate had been expanded to include research in area beyond the Biomedical
Sciences.
- Making representation to decision-makers regarding Species at Risk
Legislation.
- Developing scientific arguments in support of the Kyoto Protocol.
CFBS and Partners Activities
- CFBS Executive Director prepared a brief for the Innovation Strategy
"Capacity for Innovation".
- CFBS May Lobby: a) Biomedical Group and b) CCUBC & Zoology. visited
14 decision-makers.
- October 22: CFBS lobbied with the Health Research Advocacy Network
(HRAN), 5 of CFBS members took part with another 45 individuals from
8 other organizations.
- November 3 & 4: CFBS in concert with the Chemistry Institute
of Canada and the Canadian Physicists (Tri-Council Lobby) took part
in visits to parliamentarians.
- CFBS became a founding member of the Health Research Advocacy Network
(HRAN) in the summer of 2002.
- HRAN commissioned the preparation of a brief for Government defining
the benefits of investing in Health Research.
- The Canadian Consortium for Research (CCR) - the CFBS Executive Director
serving as a member of the steering committee- sent a letter to Provincial
Premiers requesting that they with the federal government develop a
joint strategy regarding post secondary education.
- The CFBS Executive Director served on the program committee of the
Partnership Group in Science and Engineering (PAGSE). This organization
develops a symposium each year to make parliamentarians aware of various
areas of science that are evolving in Canada.
- A series of CFBS Alerts were sent to the CFBS membership concerning
issues of interest to the Life Sciences Community.
- In all these activities we have tried to lever additional support
for the issues important to the life sciences community. This has been
accomplished by developing partnerships with other groups with similar
mandates. These partnerships resulted in increased numbers and greater
impact when speaking with "decision-makers".
Where is the greatest weakness in our ability to deliver comment
of issues related to the life sciences community? In the biomedical
area we have enhanced our ability to deliver our message through linkage
with HRAN. The broad areas of research in academe, industry and government
are helped by our contact with PAGSE. These same areas are also enhanced
by our membership in CCR. Two areas, however, are insufficiently covered.
One is Government laboratories and the vision that is needed to clearly
state their role in Canadian Science. The second involves the environmental/ecological
areas of the life sciences. Currently, we have the constructive advice
of both the Canadian Society for Zoologists (CSZ)- joined CFBS this year-
and the Canadian Council for University Biology Chairs (CCUBC). It would
provide CFBS with an additional dimension and at the same time enhance
our credibility with decision makers to have additional representation
by Plant Science and Ecology Groups.
The International Dimension
Given that international partnerships are becoming ever more important,
a number of our members have suggested that we explore ways that Life
Sciences in Canada could be represented within the International Union
of Biological Sciences (IUBS). Hamid Jorjani (NRC) joined our meeting
to indicate how we might become part of the IUBS and the financial requirements
that we, as a Life Sciences Community, would have to meet. As a follow-up
we have been in contact with Dr. Marvalee Wake, President, IUBS and have
been encouraged to pursue membership in IUBS.
Partnerships
in Scientific Meetings
Developments over the past several years have witnessed a change in the
CFBS Annual Meeting format. The new format involves choosing a theme and
having a number of symposia organized around this theme. This means that
each year the scientific meeting will appeal only to a portion of the
CFBS membership. Those individuals attending, however, should feel they
are receiving an in-depth treatment of the subject in which they are interested.
To compensate the other members in the Federation we have begun to provide
support for annual meetings hosted by the individual societies. In the
past two years we have provided the Physiologists, the Exercise Physiologists
and the Biophysicists with financial help by sponsoring a speaker. This
sort of partnership assists the societies and hopefully helps to cement
the relationship between the Societies and the CFBS office. More recently,
we have agreed to provide support for the International Meeting in Toronto
being hosted by the Canadian Society of Biochemistry, Cell & Molecular
Biology. In addition, when asked we have advertised various meetings of
the Life Sciences Societies on our website.
To provide a greater service to the Life Sciences Community CFBS has,
on a annual basis, partnered with various CIHR Institutes. Over the past
two years the CFBS AGM has included cooperation of three of the CIHR Institutes.
The 2003 Meeting in Ottawa will involve a 4th Institute. This action on
the part of CFBS should help in displaying the strength in those areas
of the Life Sciences and assist in providing some of the glue to make
these Institutes act as a community of investigators. In its effort to
highlight the activities of Government laboratories we have welcomed the
involvement of researchers fro the Health Canada laboratories, the NRC
Institute of Biological Sciences and Agri-Food Canada.
Public Awareness
Over the past three years we have presented a Public Forum at each of
the CFBS Meetings:
1. Future of Health Research (Year 2000)
2. Genetically Modified Foods (Year 2001)
3. Bio-terrorism (Year 2002)
We continue to welcome suggestions for issues that would be of current
interest to both the public and scientific communities.
Future Scientific Themes
Each
year we solicit suggestions for scientific themes to be held at future
CFBS Meetings. The theme for 2003 will be Cardiovascular and Metabolic
Disease; this theme is being organized in cooperation with the Pharmacological
Society of Canada (PSC). In addition, the Canadian Physiological Society
(CPS) has arranged a symposium "The Aging Skeleton". The Canadian
Society for Nutritional Sciences, the Ottawa Heart Institute, Health Canada,
and the NRC Institute for Biological Sciences will also organize symposia
related to the major theme of the conference. The theme of the conference
is being sponsored, in part, by the CIHR Institute for Circulatory and
Respiratory Health.
Plans are taking place for the 2004 CFBS Meeting that we expect to hold
in Vancouver. The theme suggested for this conference is "Cancer
& Cell Biology". An organizer for the scientific program of this
conference has been identified and has agreed to take on this role. Discussions
have begun related to the 2005 Annual Meeting but no firm decision has
yet been taken regarding theme and/or location.
Discussions were initiated to determine whether CFBS could perform a
service to its member societies in assisting them in organizing their
annual scientific meetings. Many of the societies that belong to the Federation
have traditionally held their own (often winter) meetings. These meetings,
in the past, have been organized by members within each society. Given
the disappearance of support staff in universities, hosting the organization
of such meetings is becoming increasingly more onerous for each society.
Since CFBS has successfully organized scientific meetings, it believes
it could provide this service should the individuals societies wish us
to do so.
During the meeting CFBS reported on the success of its website. Several
of the sources expressed interest in the possibility that CFBS act more
as a secretariat and serve to assist societies maintain their websites.
In addition, CFBS could function to update society membership lists and
other functions related to online services.
Can CFBS provide other services? At its meeting in Montreal
the Internet Café was introduced to allow scientists to keep in
contact with their labs and/or others. In the previous year the Employment
Fair was initiated. CFBS is constantly on the lookout for suggestions
that will make its annual meeting more useful, to the community it serves.
Finally, for the past 3 years we have organized our scientific meetings
using what we have termed "the thematic approach" with a number
of symposia devoted to the theme chosen. Is this the best way for us to
organize our annual meeting? Are the others types of meeting format that
would hold greater appeal to our membership? Partnering with societies
to help them with their more specialized meetings would appear currently
to provide Canada with the most logical spectrum of meetings.
Financial Issues
Currently,
CFBS appears to be in good health financially. It is clear, however, that
in order to be more aggressive in our role in advocacy (ie. develop the
data on which to base our writing of briefs) we need to develop ways of
reducing our overhead. Our office is also embarrassed that it has for
financial reasons been unable to translate our briefs into Francais.
Our recent membership in HRAN should help us accomplish one of these
goals. HRAN has recently commissioned the preparation of a brief documenting
the benefits of investing in health research. We have also begun discussions
with a number of organizations, similar to our own, with the aim of sharing
space and equipment to reduce overhead costs.
Our income, from sources other than societies continues to grow. Contributing
to this are fees for job postings, advertising on our website (see website
chart). Our website income will help reduce our dependence on society
fees. The membership of 3 new societies in CFBS over the past 3 years
has also helped CFBS' bottom line.

The CFBS Annual Meeting, revenue from sponsorships, registrations, exhibitors,
and "employment fair" participants all have contributed to our
improved financial health (see chart).
During the last several years, CFBS has been pleased with the growing
support, by the Life Sciences Research community, of the efforts of the
Ottawa office. Enlarging our membership will be key, however, to making
CFBS more effective in pursuing the issues that are important to the continued
vitality of research in the life sciences in Canada. Constructive suggestions
and involvement by members of our community are key to CFBS' being effective
in promoting the issues important to our researches.
Dr. Bruce H. Sells, FRS(C)
Executive Director
|